12/2 Changes Made to Section 4

One comment on “12/2 Changes Made to Section 4

  1. David Hoffman
    We have noticed two typos in Section 4 of the bill that are creating confusion on how the use limitation section works. The two changes we are making to clarify ify our intent are:

    1. In Section 4c we had a reference to “notices required by Section 4(b).” This should instead be “notices required by Section 4(f)”.
    2. In Section 4d(1)(C) we had a reference to “C. any uses that satisfy the language of consistent uses under 4(d)(c)”. This should instead be “C. any uses that satisfy the language of consistent uses under 4(d)(3)”.

    We are also cleaning up some formatting issues, but at this time those are the only substantive changes.